Pre-Trial Services
The Pre-Trial Services unit of the department
was established in February, 1990, to develop a supervised
release program aimed at reducing jail overcrowding. All
defendants booked into the jail are screened to determine
eligibility. Defendants released into the program by the courts
receive regular release, intensive supervision release or
electronic monitoring release.
The purpose of Pre-Trial Services is to keep the
jail population manageable; alleviate jail overcrowding;
initiate contact with all individuals who are arrested in the
county to determine the offender's status; provide supervised
release; provide treatment and referral options for offenders
when needed; allow offenders to hire their own attorneys; and
provide information to judges on the defendants at their first
court appearance so they can make an informed recommendation on
release.
The Pre-Trial Services staff, pre-sentence
investigation writers, electronic monitoring staff, absconder
caseload staff, and the CSCD Information Systems Director, share
office space in the old jail, a turn-of-the-century Williamson
County landmark. The staff consists of five full time pre-trial
and electronic monitoring positions, three pre-sentence
investigation writers, and the absconder caseload officer and
his assistant.
The following table compares the number of
offenders released from jail into the pre-trial program to the
number of offenders denied release from fiscal years ’97 -
’00. Those discharged bonded out of jail on their own.
|
Pre-Trial
Release Program
Fiscal
Years '98 - '00
|
|
FY ‘98
|
FY ‘99
|
FY
'00 |
|
Released
|
320
|
268
|
295 |
|
Denied
Release
|
194
|
177
|
170 |
|
Discharged
|
315
|
380
|
254 |
|
Since the pre-trial unit was established,
offenders released into the pre-trial services program have
steadily increased. The program served 403 defendants in fiscal
year ’00 after conducting 1,494 interviews for program
eligibility.
Additionally, 45% (130) of the pre-trial
defendants were released into some form of community
supervision. Bond forfeitures have remained consistently low and
were at under 2% (6) in FY '00.
The following table compares pre-trial
discharges by discharge reason:
|
PTS by Discharge Reason
Fiscal Years ‘98-00
|
|
|
FY
'98 |
FY
‘99
|
FY’00
|
|
Community Supervision
|
144 |
161
|
130 |
|
Dismissed
|
22 |
20
|
21 |
|
Revoked from Pre-trial
|
79 |
63
|
88 |
|
Sentenced to
Jail/ID/SJ
|
14 |
25
|
25 |
|
Bond Forfeiture
|
32 |
10
|
6 |
|
Reduced to
Misdemeanor
|
0 |
1
|
4 |
|
Other
|
24 |
14
|
18 |
The pre-trial program conducts an extensive
urinalysis testing program with the OnTrak® Drug Detection
System, conducting 4,342 tests in fiscal year ’00. The
officers test a sample on site with results available in three
minutes. The primary tests are in three categories: marijuana,
cocaine and amphetamines. A second test is used to confirm
positive results from an initial screening test. Positive
samples are sent to the Central Texas Treatment Center
Laboratory for confirmation testing. Two methods are used to
detect alcohol usage. The most reliable method is an admission
of use by the offender. Following admission, the officer then
utilizes the continuum of
sanctions appropriate to the individual. The second method
requires the use of an alcohol testing product that detects
alcohol in the offender's saliva or urine.
Top
of Page
|